Real and ideal rationality

Formal epistemologists often claim that our credences should be representable by a probability function. Complete probabilistic coherence, however, is only possible for ideal agents, raising the question of how this requirement relates to everyday judgments concerning rationality. One answer being rational contextual matter, standards rationality change along with situation. Just like who counts as tall changes depending on whether we are considering toddlers or basketball players, perhaps what shifts according agents creatures more ourselves. Even though number formal have endorsed type solution, I will argue there no way spell out account can make sense about Those defend coherence requirements need an alternative relationship between real and